Abstract:
On the 15th of March, 1972, the Government decided to appoint
a Committee with Professor Muzaffar Ahmed Choudhuri, the then
Vice-Chancellor, Dacca University, presently Chairman of the
University Grants Commission, as Chairman to determine the policy
regarding the fresh recruitment to the Government services.
2. As the Members of the Committee, the Government decided
to include the following:—
(/) A representative from the Planning Commission.
(ii) Secretary, Ministry of Cabinet Affairs (Establishment
Division).
(iii) A political representative to be nominated by the Prime
Minister.
3. Professor Anisur Rahman, Member, Planning Commission
was nominated by the Planning Commission to be a Member of the
Committee and Mr Abdul Muntaquim Choudhury, the then M.C.A.,
now Ambassador of Bangladesh in Japan, was nominated by the
Prime Minister to be the Political Representative on the Committee.
Mr M. M. Zaman was initially a Member of the Committee in his
capacity as Secretary, Ministry of Cabinet Affairs (Establishment
Division). Later, he was appointed as the wholetime Member-
Secretary of the Committee 4. Terms of reference of the Committee were later expanded as
follows:—
(a) To consider the present structure of various services, both
technical and non-technical, and determine the future
structure keeping in view the functional needs and
requirements of the Government;
(b) To ‘ consider" tfia’ amalgamation of all the Civil
Services (that is, services other than Defence) into one
unified service; (c) To determine the principles of integration of the personnel
of various services in the new structure, and to determine
the inter se seniority of personnel of the different services
having similar academic background and job experiences
in the process of merger or amalgamation, in case some
structural changes are envisaged;
(d ) To determine the future recruitment policy in the Government
services at various levels keeping in view the
educational and other job requirements; and
(e) To prepare and recommend a comprehensive scheme for
administrative reorganisation. 5. The Committee in the course of its examination of the issues,
heard the representations from 183 service associations, interviewed
13 Ministers and 55 high officials, viz., Secretaries to the Government
and heads of autonomous organisations, sector corporations of
nationalised enterprises, insurance, banking and other financial credit
institutions.
6. The Committee visited Chittagong and Rajshahi districts to
study the district administration and to meet a cross section of the
public and the district officials. The Committee had also visited the
U.S.S.R. on the invitation of the Soviet Government to obtain the
first-hand knowledge about the administrative and service structure
existing in Soviet Russia. Joint meetings were held with the National
Pay Commission to exchange ideas and views and to deliberate on
•common issues. One of these meetings was presided over by the
Prime Minister.7. In the course of its examination, the Committee found the
existing services divided into too many distinct entities with artificial
walls built around them with varying career prospects, lacking in 8. On the administrative side, the Committee found the structure
•outmoded, the system sluggish and irresponsive to the people and the
procedure complicated, confusing and ponderous. It has, therefore,
recommended a simpler structure with more rational distribution of
work and responsibility with built-in arrangement for the quick
disposal of business and positive response to the people.
9. The first part of the Report, which was submitted to the
Prime Minister on the 1st of Baisakh, 1380, contained the proposals
for the reorganisation of the Services. The reorganisation of the
Services had to be taken up first in order to assist the National P?y
“Commission in determining the new pay scales. 10. In the second part of the Report which is now Aig
submitted, recommendations have been made regarding the reorganisation
of the Secretariat System and Procedure of Work, Ministerial
and Departmental Organisation, and District and Local Government
Administration.
11. Mr Abdul Montaquim Choudhury could not sign this part
of the Report as he had to leave for Tokyo to take up his ambassadorial
appointment. The deliberations were, however, completed before
he left. He is in agreement with the conclusions reached and the
recommendations made in this part of the Report.