Abstract:
When the present Government assumed responsibility, the
criminal cases pending with the Police for investigation and for trial
with the Magistrates were about 18,000 and 1,50,000 respectively.
There were a large number of under-trial prisoners in the Jail for as
long as 10 years or more. Being very concerned about such an
alarming situation, the Chief Martial Law Administrator appointed
a Committee on the 20th of April, 1982 to suggest suitable amendments
in the Criminal Procedure Code, 1898, to ensure expeditious
disposal of criminal proceedings. The Committee submitted its
report on the 31st of May, 1982. It made a number of recommendations
involving legal as well as the administrative aspects of criminal
justice. These were duly considered, and withvsome modifications,
accepted by the Government. Pursuant to the aforesaid decision of the Government, the Code
of Criminal Procedure (Second Amendment) Ordinance, 1982 was
promulgated and a set of administrative measures were taken. This
had a salutary effect upon the administration of criminal justice in
the country. The number of cases pending for long either with the
Police or in the courts of law was substantially reduced within a few
months. In the period between September, 1982 and June, 1983
cases pending with the Magistrates have reduced from 1,24,011 to
82,125. It was however, noted that aforementioned legal as well as
administrative measures did not have any significant impact upon the
disposal of cases in the Courts of Sessions. This necessitated further
enhancement of the powers of the District and Additional District
Magistrates and, within 10 months 13,407 cases have been disposed
of by the- Additional District Magistrates. .This has significantly
lessened the burden upon the Courts of Sessions and the number of
Sessions triable cases has come down from 24,826 cases to 18,411
cases within the span of 6 months ending June 30, 1983. By any
yardstick it is indeed remarkable. It will be seen that as many as four Amendment Ordinances
were promulgated within a period of about one year. After the
introduction Qf each set of amendments the impact thereof wasi very
closely monitored and the desirability or otherwise of further
bhanges carefully examined. It was only in the light of the actual
experience and .the need to further streamline the machinery o f Justice
that subsequent amendments were made. Apart from ensuring expeditious dispensation of justice, the
objectives behind the legal and administrative reforms are to restore
people’s trust and confidence in administration of criminal justice
and to bring about an overall improvement in the quality of the
Police and the Magistracy.. It is hoped that with proper understanding
and implementation of the reforms and measures these
objectives will be achieved. The performance of the Magistrates and the Poli]ce will be a
very important factor in the success or otherwise of the legal and
administrative measures undertaken by the Government. It is,
therefore, imperative "‘that they are fully conversant not only with the
salient features of the amendments to the Code of Criminal Procedure
but also with all other important provisions of the Code. With
this object in view this booklet has been prepared. It contains
the Report of the ^Criminal Law Reforms Committee and the
Government decisions on its recommendations, the four Code of
Criminal Procedure Amendment Ordinances and the amended Second
Schedule of the Code, the village Court Ordinance, 1976 and a. note
explaining the salient aspects of the amendments' as well as some
other relevant and important provisions of the Code and the village
Courts Ordinance. Relevant important executive orders have also
been included in this booklet. It is hopejd .that the Police officers, the Magistrates as well as the
Judges will find, this booklet helpful